nanog mailing list archives
Re: The day SORBS goes away ...
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:00:24 +0530
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
Yahoo is only a hegemony among spam havens, not a monopoly. There's still freelance havens out there, and they'll go away when SORBS does.
Sorbs did have a decent set of traps - and did catch a lot of spam. The problem was atrociously poor maintenance - stale entries, entries that'd reappear due to db issues, people skills of the volunteers handling the queue .. I'd have thought there'd be some improvement with their being acquired. Got to see. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS?!, (continued)
- Re: SORBS?! Mark Foster (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! chris (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- The day SORBS goes away ... goemon (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... goemon (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Rich Kulawiec (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Hank Nussbacher (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Matthew Palmer (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Barry Shein (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... TR Shaw (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Brian Keefer (Apr 09)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Ray Van Dolson (Apr 09)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Dan White (Apr 09)
- RE: The day SORBS goes away ... Nathan Eisenberg (Apr 09)