nanog mailing list archives

Re: Automatic IPv6 due to broadcast


From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:57:28 -0500

Most switches nowadays have dhcpv4 detection that can be enabled for port
ranges.  Not sure about v6.

-Grant

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:

On 4/17/12 01:37 , Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
I don't understand why a problem with a tunnel 'leaves a bad taste with
IPv6'. Since when a badly configured DNS zone left people with a 'bad
taste for DNS', or a badly configured switch left people with 'a bad
taste for spanning tree' or 'a bad taste for vlan trunking' ?

It seems to me that what are perceived as operational mistakes and/or
plain lack of knowledge for some technologies is perceived as a fault of
the protocol itself in the case of IPv6.

rogue dhcp servers are sufficiently common that tools had to be
developed to address their existence and they're still a nuisance after
all that.

People need to get their acts together.

indeed.




Current thread: