nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:33:48 +0100 (BST)
Reality check: I don't know that this is all that important, in the end. So long as you can use an IGP locally with a default route to reach a copy of the database, whether it be based on DNS, an RPKI, or anything else, then you can bootstrap your EGP routing. If everything goes down at the same time, then you would just start rebuilding from the places where the root servers live, no matter what system's root servers we're talking about.
or you wait for the Elders of the Internet to visit with blessings http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDbyYGrswtg brandon
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Christopher Morrow (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dmitry Burkov (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Message not available
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Phil Regnauld (Apr 30)