Re: rpki vs. secure dns?

[Dmitry Burkov <dburk () burkov aha ru>]

Danny, 
just one more comment.

So named vendor's support can be the worst case when there are no practical ways to deploy and it is  absolutely
not clear - should we follow this hierarchical model - I think it is  the key point as we pushed ourselves by inertia 
to this way of thinking.


Imho - it is way to nowhere in such form

We need more flexible, distributed architecture behind - no matter - which interests will be lobbied as we have got 
already.



On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:

> On Apr 28, 2012, at 6:34 AM, Alex Band wrote:
>
> > All in all, RPKI has really good traction and with native router support in Cisco, Juniper and Quagga, this is only 
> > getting better. 
>
> We should be more careful with statements such as this, they're conflating important things that add to the confusion 
> in this area.
>
> None of these implementations support "RPKI" today.  What they support is a new protocol for onboarding routing 
> policy data (some call this a [VRP],  essentially prefix,origin bindings) into soft state in a router.
>
> -danny
>
> [VRP] https://ripe64.ripe.net/presentations/74-120417.sidr-origin.pdf