nanog mailing list archives
Re: do not filter your customers
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:35:44 +0530
So, it is not OK for traffic to be /intentionally/ diverted through a malevolent AS
traffic? i do not hold the fantasy that traffic is highly correlated to the control plane. see http://archive.psg.com/optometry.pdf if you need a disproof of the fantasy.
but it is OK for traffic to be /unintentionally/ diverted through a (possibly) malevolent AS?
intent? how the hell do i know intent? i can barely read my own mind let alone telstra's. and i very much doubt telstra thought they were _attacking_ optus. randy
Current thread:
- RE: do not filter your customers, (continued)
- RE: do not filter your customers George Bonser (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Nick Hilliard (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Nick Hilliard (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Shane Amante (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Nick Hilliard (Feb 25)
- Re: do not filter your customers Dongting Yu (Feb 25)
- Re: do not filter your customers Dobbins, Roland (Feb 25)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Dobbins, Roland (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Shane Amante (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 25)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 25)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 24)
- Re: do not filter your customers Dobbins, Roland (Feb 23)
- Re: do not filter your customers Randy Bush (Feb 23)
- Re: do not filter your customers Christian de Larrinaga (Feb 23)