nanog mailing list archives
Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks)
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:25:43 -0600
Once upon a time, Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us> said:
AFAIK there's no law covering the use of what party X considers their 32 bit numbers (assigned by party A) by party Y.So, to pose the obvious question: Should there be? (I honestly don't know the answer is to this question, and am asking in earnest for opinions on the subject)
Personally, I'd rather see the networking community work it out internally, rather than invite government intervention (I hardly think it would stop at regulating 32/128 bit numbers). Besides, how would that work? Say ARIN assigns US company X (operating only in the US) a block, but German company Y (with no US operations) starts announcing the same block. How are US or German laws going to help, when the parties have no common jurisdiction? There need to be better ways to notify (and get action from) upstreams, upstreams/peers of upstreams, etc. Since not all peering is public knowledge, it can be difficult to know who needs notification, so some type of clearinghouse would be good. Maybe a mailing list, made up of network operators, in some type of group, ... :-) -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) David Conrad (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Antonio Querubin (Feb 01)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) George Bonser (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) David Conrad (Feb 01)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) George Bonser (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Chris Adams (Feb 01)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Chris Adams (Feb 01)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) George Bonser (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Blake Dunlap (Feb 01)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) George Bonser (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Blake Dunlap (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) David Conrad (Feb 01)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Ray Soucy (Feb 02)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Eric Brunner-Williams (Feb 02)
- RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) George Bonser (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Jimmy Hess (Feb 02)
- Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked Networks) Jared Mauch (Feb 01)