nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: John Schneider <str8steelerfan () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:33:35 -0600
Another interesting thing that I noticed, is that AS33611 is not advertising any prefixes other than yours. Either they do not have any of their own (unlikely) or they are advertising their own legitimate prefixes from another AS however I doubt that is the case. It sounds like you were able to verify that this is indeed a malicious attack. If that is truly the case, I would certainly be in contact with your lawyers as this is certainly causing you financial loss and since it is easily verifiable, you would have a solid case i would think. I am no attorney but it seems like a no-brainer to me. So, it does look like you are finally announcing your prefixes as a /24 and that most traffic is again coming to your AS. that probably helped quite a bit right? Regards, John
Current thread:
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges, (continued)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Kelvin Williams (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Ricky Beam (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Ido Szargel (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Eric Tykwinski (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Andrew Fried (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges John Schneider (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges John Schneider (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges George Bonser (Jan 31)