nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whois 172/12
From: Jay Moran <jay+NANOG () tp org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:39:48 -0500
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:
AOL has and uses (publicly) a bunch of space in 172/8. In fact, looking at a BGP table, I'd say they're by far the largest user (one of the only) in that /8.
We, AOL, have 172.128/10, 172.192/12, 172.208/13, 172.216/16. These blocks represent our dial-up ISP customers that can't seem to get broadband or for whatever reason, stay on dial-up. Also pretty amazingly is how high the simultaneous user count has stayed, guess the folks that left weren't the ones on in the evenings between 7-10pm ET. We (mostly me) are looking into solutions to be able to remove the reliance on this space. Unfortunately, most of the developers, who created the various servers/applications that dole out these addresses, all left in the late 90's with some pretty fat wallets; at this point... it's an archeology dig. Jay -- Jay Moran http://tp.org/jay
Current thread:
- Re: Whois 172/12, (continued)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Jimmy Hess (Jan 15)
- RE: Whois 172/12 Keith Medcalf (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Justin M. Streiner (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
- RE: Whois 172/12 Network IP Dog (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Tom Hill (Jan 19)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Robert Bonomi (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 bmanning (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Jon Lewis (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Jay Moran (Jan 15)
- Re: Whois 172/12 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Whois 172/12 Alex Ryu (Jan 15)