nanog mailing list archives
Re: US DOJ victim letter
From: -Hammer- <bhmccie () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600
On a less serious note, did anyone notice the numbers on the fbi.gov link? I'm pretty sure they are implying those are IP addresses. 123.456.789 and 987.654.321. Must be the same folks that do the Nexus documentation for Cisco.
-Hammer- "I was a normal American nerd" -Jack Herer On 1/19/2012 4:36 PM, Ryan Gelobter wrote:
They are related to the DNSChanger and Ghostclick malware as ML said. The e-mails to us did come from the DOJ e-mail servers and were legitimate. The phone number is legit as well. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Todd Lyons<tlyons () ivenue com> wrote:On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Carlos Alcantar<carlos () race com> wrote:+1 on these emails we have received 3 of them.Three here as well. -- SOPA: Any attempt to [use legal means to] reverse technological advances is doomed. --Leo Leporte
Current thread:
- Re: US DOJ victim letter, (continued)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Chris Adams (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Lane Powers (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter PC (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Simon Lockhart (Jan 19)
- Message not available
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Jay Hennigan (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Alan Clegg (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Chris Adams (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Todd Lyons (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Ryan Gelobter (Jan 19)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter -Hammer- (Jan 20)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Mike Andrews (Jan 20)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Robert Bonomi (Jan 20)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Bryan Horstmann-Allen (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Randy Epstein (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Mike (Jan 27)
- Customer service (was Re: US DOJ victim letter) Sean Donelan (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Randy Epstein (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Martin Hannigan (Jan 27)