nanog mailing list archives
Re: Megaupload.com seized
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:00:15 -0600 (CST)
Nick B <nick () pelagiris org> wrote:
I'm about 90% sure that in a fair court, it would be concluded that disabling the reported URL qualifies as disabling access to the material. The court might then issue an injunction to, in the future, disable *all* *possible* access to the material, but that's not the current text of the law. YMMV
The crux of the issue is whether a single DMCA take down notice refers only to the content itemized in the notice, or to _all_ content that matches the identification in the notice. It is a *significant* difference, because the former requires the _complainant_ to identify all the 'infringing' items, while the latter requires the notice _recipient_ to search out all other content that matches the notice. Obviously, each side would rather have the other guy do all the work.`
Current thread:
- Re: Megaupload.com seized, (continued)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized James Smith (Jan 21)
- RE: Megaupload.com seized George Bonser (Jan 22)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Michael Thomas (Jan 21)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Joel jaeggli (Jan 21)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Michael Thomas (Jan 21)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Jay Ashworth (Jan 21)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Steven Bellovin (Jan 21)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Roland Perry (Jan 22)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Nick B (Jan 22)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Joseph Snyder (Jan 22)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Robert Bonomi (Jan 22)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Jay Ashworth (Jan 22)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Kevin Day (Jan 21)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Joly MacFie (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Joly MacFie (Jan 20)
- RE: Megaupload.com seized Don Bowman (Jan 23)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 23)