nanog mailing list archives
Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:55:02 -0500
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:47:15 PST, Owen DeLong said:
Where the definition of (efficient) is highly flexible and almost certainly does not refer to bit conservation.
There's a reason we put 128 bits in there. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?, (continued)
- RE: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? George Bonser (Jan 26)
- RE: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? George Bonser (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Mark Tinka (Jan 27)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Ray Soucy (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Jeroen Massar (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Tim Chown (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Ray Soucy (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Message not available
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Tim Chown (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 26)
- Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices? Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 31)
- "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) Jeroen Massar (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) William Herrin (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) Jeroen Massar (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) William Herrin (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) Jeroen Massar (Jan 25)
- Re: "Registered ULA" (Was: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?) William Herrin (Jan 25)