nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 () mac com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:34:21 +0100
Only for a full table BGP, in fact it is not able to learn a full BGP table. The X480 could do it, but it is very slow and they miss some features Fabien Le 27 janv. 2012 à 11:25, Leigh Porter a écrit :
On 27 Jan 2012, at 10:21, "Fabien Delmotte" <fdelmotte1 () mac com> wrote:I worked for Extreme, and I deployed a lot of X650 (24 10G ports) for DataCenter environment. The box is really good. In fact if you use the box at a layer 2 it is perfect, BUT DON'T use their BGP code, they never understood what is BGP :)Is that don't use for Internet facing full table BGP or do you include iBGP for say VPN as well? -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton, (continued)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Tim Vollebregt (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Alvaro Pereira (Jan 29)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Joe Provo (Jan 29)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Rodrick Brown (Jan 30)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Grant Ridder (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Fabien Delmotte (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Leigh Porter (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Fabien Delmotte (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Fabien Delmotte (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Erik Bais (Jan 27)
- Re: 10G switchrecommendaton Grant Ridder (Jan 27)