nanog mailing list archives

RE: Admin? Bueller?

From: "Kurt Ellzey" <kurt () idb-sys com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:48:04 -0400

We were letting people practice their procmail :)  They've both been

filtered.


It's situations like this that make me happy I signed up.  I just started
with the list this week, and finding out tools for correcting specific tasks
is outstanding.  Finding ones that actually WORK is a bonus.

Thanks for the tip.

Current thread:

*spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)
  - Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
  - Admin? Bueller? Seth Mattinen (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Lynda (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Jon Lewis (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Joe Greco (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Matt Griswold (Jul 10)
    - RE: Admin? Bueller? Kurt Ellzey (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? valdis . kletnieks (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? George Herbert (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? shawn wilson (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? JC Dill (Jul 10)
    - Re: Admin? Bueller? Doug Barton (Jul 10)