nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real world sflow vs netflow?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 11:15:30 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
NetFlow, jFlow, IPFIX deal with flows. You can discuss sampling accuracy and things like that, but working with flows is more accurate.
If you do 1:1000 sampling with both Netflow and sFlow, why would one of them be more accurate than the other? If you analyze the flow on the device or on the collector (as might be done with sFlow), I don't see why one would be btter than the other.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Real world sflow vs netflow? David Hubbard (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Jeroen Massar (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Harry Hoffman (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Joe Loiacono (Jul 13)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Łukasz Bromirski (Jul 14)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 14)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Łukasz Bromirski (Jul 14)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Paolo Lucente (Jul 15)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Nick Hilliard (Jul 15)
- RE: Real world sflow vs netflow? James Braunegg (Jul 16)
- RE: Real world sflow vs netflow? David Hubbard (Jul 16)
- RE: Real world sflow vs netflow? James Braunegg (Jul 16)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Simon Leinen (Jul 17)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Nick Hilliard (Jul 17)
- Re: Real world sflow vs netflow? Peter Phaal (Jul 17)