nanog mailing list archives
Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS)
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:50:38 +0000
On Jul 25, 2012, at 1:13 PM, <sthaug () nethelp no> wrote:
No, routers normally do *not* reassemble fragments.
Absolutely correct. I missed this in the rest of the reply, good catch! ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Frank Bulk (Jul 24)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Roland Dobbins (Jul 24)
- RE: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Frank Bulk (Jul 24)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Jimmy Hess (Jul 24)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) sthaug (Jul 24)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 24)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 24)
- RE: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Frank Bulk (Jul 25)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 25)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Roland Dobbins (Jul 24)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) John Kristoff (Jul 25)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Joel Maslak (Jul 25)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 25)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Mark Andrews (Jul 25)
- Re: DDoS using port 0 and 53 (DNS) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 25)