nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 04:19:27 +0000
On Jul 19, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
No, reusing somebody's prefix is A Very Bad Idea.
Concur 100%. There is no security value to doing this whatsoever - quite the opposite, given the possible negative consequences to reachability and, thus, availability. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Cameron Byrne (Jul 17)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT TJ (Jul 17)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Justin M. Streiner (Jul 17)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Andrey Khomyakov (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT TJ (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Grant Ridder (Jul 18)
- RE: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Chuck Church (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Måns Nilsson (Jul 19)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Dobbins, Roland (Jul 25)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT bmanning (Jul 19)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT Andrey Khomyakov (Jul 18)
- Re: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT joel jaeggli (Jul 25)