nanog mailing list archives
Re: LinkedIn password database compromised
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:21:17 -0400
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 03:49:18PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
open source sure would be good
I think it's mandatory. It's the only way we can have even modest trust that it does what it claims to do. And...as the last week's events have shown us...vendor-signed software sometimes isn't. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised, (continued)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Christopher Morrow (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Tei (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Marshall Eubanks (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised valdis . kletnieks (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Christopher Morrow (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Owen DeLong (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Michael Hallgren (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Rich Kulawiec (Jun 08)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Owen DeLong (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Aaron C. de Bruyn (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised -Hammer- (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Owen DeLong (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised -Hammer- (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Matthew Kaufman (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Owen DeLong (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised David Walker (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Owen DeLong (Jun 07)
- Re: LinkedIn password database compromised Jimmy Hess (Jun 08)