nanog mailing list archives

Re: Dear Linkedin,


From: Barry Shein <bzs () world std com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:11:04 -0400


Eliminating fraud isn't an objective of card issuers.  Making money is.
Fraud reduction is only done when the savings from the reduced fraud
exceeds both the cost of the fraud preventing measure and any revenue
that is lost because of inconveniencing customers.

Right, but eliminating fraud should be an objective of consumers because
ultimately, we are the ones paying for it regardless of who "eats it" on the
actual transaction.

This applies just as well to fraud-prevention measures, a cost is a
cost is a cost, your perceived morality of the cost makes no
difference, money is fungible! Which means, money doesn't care! You'd
have to make up the cost of all that fraud-prevention in the same way.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

The World              | bzs () TheWorld com           | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD        | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die    | Public Access Internet     | SINCE 1989     *oo*


Current thread: