nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE
From: mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree <mohamed.abosree () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:39:05 +0200
Thanks all, That's sound more logic to me, so we assign IPv6 for lo0 on every hop, so it can understand ICMP control packet. But who would use these packets? If I'm at my 6PE then i ping using Lo0 IPv4 address because we are not enabling IPV6 Routing/Dual stack so it can carry IPv6 addresses across my backbone. I mean to use IPv6 on loopbacks then i need to advertise them on some routing protocol BGP/OPSF but actually we are not enabling these protocols in the Core. An i correct in my logic? BR, Mohamed On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:29 PM, adam vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk>wrote:
Right the ::FFFF::<ipv4-addr> sounds familiar I guess there was also an option that the P router would just label switch the packet towards the exit PE and the PE would than originate the ICMP back to source Or you can turn off TTL propagation across the core -so the ICMP could only time out at the PEs adam -----Original Message----- From: Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) [mailto:naikumar () cisco com] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 12:52 PM To: Daniel Roesen; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Hi, Per my understanding, it is not required to have ipv6 address in loopback intf on all P routers inorder to have 6PE work. If I remember it correctly, P router will use ::FFFF::<ipv4-addr> while originating ICMPv6 error message. -Nagendra -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Roesen [mailto:dr () cluenet de] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:02 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:56:05AM +0200, mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree wrote:I was just wondering , while I'm planning my network to support 6PE/6VPE why should i assign an IPv6 for Loopbacks? Maybe it's needed for Point-Point links or external interfaces between my peers, but anyone here know why i should assign IPv6 for all my Routers inside my ISP if we will run PE/6VPE not dual stack.Otherwise the intermediate P devices do not have an address to source ICMPv6 "hop count exceeded" error replies => traceroute doesn't work properly. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
-- Live As If You Were To Die Tomorrow. Learn As If You Were To Live Forever.
Current thread:
- IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE james jones (Jun 15)
- RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) (Jun 15)
- RE: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE adam vitkovsky (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE mohamed Osama Saad Abo sree (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Owen DeLong (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Robert McKay (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Owen DeLong (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE Daniel Roesen (Jun 15)
- Re: IPv6 Lo. for 6PE/6VPE valdis . kletnieks (Jun 15)