nanog mailing list archives
Re: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:02:56 -0400
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com> wrote:
I wonder what exactly is different/wrong in case of BSNL block 117.200.48.0/20? Is BSNL selectively announcing it only from Reliance's California based router and not any other router in Europe?
there's a fiber cut in that part of the world, and reliance is ... in the middle of it (smwe-4 I think?) maybe they decided that some of their customer traffic ought to take a less congested path?
Current thread:
- NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block Anurag Bhatia (Jun 19)
- Re: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block Anurag Bhatia (Jun 19)
- RE: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block Drew Weaver (Jun 19)
- Re: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block Jared Mauch (Jun 19)
- Re: NTT handing packets to Reliance (Flag Telecom) in California for BSNL block Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)