nanog mailing list archives
Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD
From: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan () dyn com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:28:10 -0400
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:49:37PM -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
one of the rationalizations for imposing a dnssec mandatory to implement requirement (by icann staff driven by dnssec evangelists) is
Well, I note that at least the .secure promoters haven't decided it's a good idea: ; <<>> DiG 9.7.3-P3 <<>> @NS15.IXWEBHOSTING.COM -t DNSKEY dot-secure.co +dnssec +norec +noall +comment ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 27872 ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 Best, A -- Andrew Sullivan Dyn Labs asullivan () dyn com
Current thread:
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Jimmy Hess (Jun 03)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Jay Ashworth (Jun 03)
- RE: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Keith Medcalf (Jun 03)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 04)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Andrew Sullivan (Jun 04)
- Re: Wacky Weekend: The '.secure' gTLD Eric Brunner-Williams (Jun 04)