nanog mailing list archives
Re: airFiber
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld () nsrc org>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:30:33 +0000
Drew Weaver (drew.weaver) writes:
I've read that it requires perfect line of sight, which makes it sometimes tricky. Thanks, -Drew
Define perfect line of sight ? How is this different from any other wireless link and the associated Fresnel zone ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_zone Even 100 Mbit/s wireless equipment (which ubqt also happens to make great gear for, at 800 USD / link) will need unobstructed view of the remote point - and it's not all or nothing, the performance will degrade. Cheers, Phil
Current thread:
- airFiber Eugen Leitl (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber Jared Mauch (Mar 29)
- RE: airFiber Drew Weaver (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber Phil Regnauld (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber Josh Baird (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Gordon Cook (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Greg Ihnen (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Oliver Garraux (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Anurag Bhatia (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Joel jaeggli (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 29)
- RE: airFiber Drew Weaver (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Owen DeLong (Mar 29)
- RE: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Dylan Bouterse (Mar 30)
- Re: airFiber Jared Mauch (Mar 29)