nanog mailing list archives
RE: airFiber
From: John van Oppen <jvanoppen () spectrumnet us>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:21:57 +0000
We actually have a lot of the old gigabeam radios in service, they are faster than the published specs of the airfiber links (1G full duplex vs 750 mbit/sec fd) and lower latency due to their very simplistic design. To be honest, from a network engineering standpoint, the gigabeams were conveninet as path issues would show up as ethernet errors that can be used to trigger reroutes or other events. That being said, we did not have a large variety of switches as the microwave side of our house is made up entirely of just a couple of cisco models. The gigabeams also have a pure OOB management setup. John
Current thread:
- RE: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video), (continued)
- RE: airFiber (text of the 8 minute video) Mark Gauvin (Mar 30)
- Re: airFiber Rubens Kuhl (Mar 31)
- RE: airFiber Nick Olsen (Mar 29)
- Re: airFiber Rodrick Brown (Mar 30)
- Re: airFiber Marshall Eubanks (Mar 31)
- Re: airFiber Andrew McConachie (Mar 31)
- Re: airFiber ML (Mar 31)
- Re: airFiber Matthew Kaufman (Mar 31)
- Re: airFiber Michael Loftis (Mar 31)
- Re: airFiber Blake Covarrubias (Mar 31)
- RE: airFiber John van Oppen (Mar 31)