nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:38:19 -0600
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl> wrote:
Splitting the allocation can be done for many reasons. There are known cases where one LIR >operates multiple separate networks, each with a separate routing policy. They cannot get multiple >allocations from the RIR and they cannot announce the whole allocation as a whole because of the >separate routing policies (who are sometimes required legally, for example when an NREN has both a >commercial and an educational network). Deaggregating to /48's is not a good idea, but giving an LIR
It does make sense to give the LIR a few bits. Note though I say what "should" happen. What will happen in actual fact, is probably going to be identical to IPv4. End users will go to other ISPs and demand they carry their individual /64s; resulting market pressure is more powerful than efficient design. -- -JH
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sander Steffann (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Herbert (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 10)