nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Ryan Malayter <malayter () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 13, 2:18 pm, Owen DeLong <o... () delong com> wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012, at 6:03 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:Ryan Malayter wrote:If the number of routes in DFZ is, say, 100, many routers and hosts will be default freeFor quite some time, a sub-$2000 PC running Linux/BSD has been able to cope with DFZ table sizes and handle enough packets per second to saturate two or more if the prevalent LAN interfaces of the day.What if, you run windows?Why would you want to run windows on a box you're trying to use as a router? That's like trying to invade Fort Knox with a bag of plastic soldiers.
Check your quoting depth... you're attributing Masataka Ohta's comments to me, he brought up running windows. I am the one who brought put forward the notion of a sub-$2000 DFZ router.
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Josh Hoppes (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mark Andrews (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 14)
- RE: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leigh Porter (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mike Andrews (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert Bonomi (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Josh Hoppes (Mar 14)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 13)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 14)