nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:13:44 -0400

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 () gmail com> wrote:
4 of the 6 downstreams are multihomed. Only 40321 (Emigrant Bank)
and 18762 (Dominick & Dominick LLC) are single homed to 19262 (Verizon
Online LLC).

yup... vz had for quite some time actual 'network' customers behind
19262, as part of larger multi-site deals. they also ran a 'private
mpls vpn' across that same core for a time (and likely still do...)

-chris

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Justin M. Streiner
<streiner () cluebyfour org> wrote:

On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:

A) DHCP only, single address, dynamic
B) Single Static address (uplift of 25$/month I believe?)


I think that might be $40/mo now, but I could be mistaken.


Also, I know that on 701 the rate of BGP to non-BGP customers was
increasing and was at ~30% or so as of ~2007... You'd think that 19262
would see that, see the business opportunity and offer it? Though, I
suppose they DO see the business opportunity: "You want bgp? you want
to bring your own ips? you want more than a DHCP address? Pay up, a
lot."


I wonder if something is cooking there.  When I look at a full BGP view, I
see quite a few ASNs downstream of 19262, beyond some that appear to be
internal VZ ASNs:

* 12.195.9.0/24    x.x.x.x           701 19262 30079
* 65.198.73.0/24   x.x.x.x           701 19262 40321
* 68.236.226.0/24  x.x.x.x           701 19262 18762
* 137.71.229.0/24  x.x.x.x           701 19262 20258
* 141.155.220.0/24 x.x.x.x           701 19262 36512
* 143.165.216.0/21 x.x.x.x           701 19262 2923
.....

jms




Current thread: