nanog mailing list archives
Re: Operation Ghost Click
From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 10:25:35 -0400
ISPs in the Netherlands have had a "botnet treaty" in effect since 2009, which calls for blocking, user notification, and inter-ISP information sharing. <http://ripe59.ripe.net/presentations/huijbregts-botnet-convenant.pdf> <http://www.darkreading.com/blog/227700601/dutch-isps-sign-anti-botnet-treaty.html> I don't have any data about how effective it's been, though. On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com> wrote:
On 4/26/12 10:03 PM, "Jeff Kell" <jeff-kell () utc edu> wrote:And what about the millions of users unknowingly infected with "something else" ?? (We have enough trouble isolating/remediating issues among our relatively small user base, I'd hate to be facing a major ISP size support/remediation effort...) Does anyone have a plan?Well, there's the new botnet code of conduct think (Mike O'Reirdan can chime in with more info here). Plus ISPs like the one I work at (Comcast) have been doing bot notification and remediation for some time now. I know other ISPs have different approaches, and so different bot programs, but the majority of them are doing something (with a few exceptions). Jason
Current thread:
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click), (continued)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Henry Linneweh (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Anurag Bhatia (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Anurag Bhatia (May 09)
- RE: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Naslund, Steve (May 09)
- RE: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Brandt, Ralph (May 07)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Jeroen van Aart (May 07)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Jeff Wheeler (May 07)
- Re: Operation Ghost Click Richard Barnes (May 01)