nanog mailing list archives
Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click)
From: Anurag Bhatia <me () anuragbhatia com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 14:41:43 +0530
Curious to know if naked DSL (DSL without dialtone & POTS link) is common in North America? We don't have that available here in India yet apart from fact that PSTN <<>> IP connectivity is banned which brings up back to GSM/CDMA and POTS option. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Brandt, Ralph <ralph.brandt () pateam com>wrote:
Connecticut has such a bill pending. My suggestion to people there, Get a ham radio license and a 2 meter transceiver with a car adapter....... Ralph Brandt York PA -----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared () puck nether net] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:29 PM To: Frank Bulk Cc: NANOG list Subject: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) On May 2, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:Many states have regulations regarding how long dial tone needs tolastduring a power outage. Iowa's PUC (the IUB) requires at least twohours ofbackup power. We design ours for eight hours.One thing of note that I've been tracking is this: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-04-16/landline-service-be coming-obsolete/54321184/1 I'm somewhat dubious about the following claims on the part of the carrier. This is a carrier that wants to meter your cellular data but provides wifi service inferior to the cellular data to "offload" their wireless network. -- snip -- "Bill sponsors and phone companies including AT&T say deregulating land-line phone service will increase competition and allow carriers to invest in better technology rather than expand a dying service. Some consumer organizations fear the change will hurt affordable service, especially in rural areas." -- snip -- - Jared
-- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected network! Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>| Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>
Current thread:
- Re: VoIP vs POTS (was Re: Operation Ghost Click), (continued)
- Re: VoIP vs POTS (was Re: Operation Ghost Click) Luke S. Crawford (May 03)
- Re: VoIP vs POTS (was Re: Operation Ghost Click) Jonathan Lassoff (May 03)
- RE: VoIP vs POTS (was Re: Operation Ghost Click) Brandt, Ralph (May 03)
- Re: Operation Ghost Click Jeroen van Aart (May 02)
- Re: Operation Ghost Click Chris Adams (May 02)
- Re: Operation Ghost Click Christopher Morrow (May 02)
- Re: Operation Ghost Click Chris Adams (May 02)
- RE: Operation Ghost Click Frank Bulk (May 02)
- POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Jared Mauch (May 02)
- RE: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Brandt, Ralph (May 03)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Anurag Bhatia (May 04)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Joe Abley (May 06)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Joe Hamelin (May 06)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Stephen Sprunk (May 06)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Henry Linneweh (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Anurag Bhatia (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Anurag Bhatia (May 09)
- RE: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Naslund, Steve (May 09)
- RE: POTS Ending (Re: Operation Ghost Click) Brandt, Ralph (May 07)