nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:51:15 +0000
On May 1, 2012, at 10:31 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
As Radia says in her book, we're probably stuck with BGP forever, but I frequently wonder if she is right in suggesting we could have done better by having a link state protocol instead.
At the time, link-state protocols weren't practical for the scale required - even today, it would be problematic. Ideally, this would be very nice, but I just don't think it's practical, even today. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns?, (continued)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Shane Amante (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (May 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)