nanog mailing list archives
Re: Force10 E Series at the edge?
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 22:39:11 +0000
On 5/7/12 21:17 , Jo Rhett wrote:
On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:On 3/27/12 23:21 , Roberts, Brent wrote:Is anyone running an E300 Series Chassis at the internet edge with multiple Full BGP feeds? 95th percent would be about 300 meg of traffic. BGPDoesn't support URPF which makes it unsuitable for RTBH and thereforeI was just about to pipe up and say "they do it fine!" and then I remembered that we built automatic filtering provisioning so that each edge customer got filters applied automatically based on their static assignments from us, or from IRR tables if a checkbox was marked. The boxes handled 1000x ports with ~6 filters per port no problem, but yeah, real uRPF would be nice.
Yeah, there's enough CAM on EJ linecards for the resultant rules either way but I know what I'd prefer. I do use and am reasonably happy with exascale, just not in that role.
-- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
Current thread:
- Re: Force10 E Series at the edge? Jo Rhett (May 07)
- Re: Force10 E Series at the edge? Joel jaeggli (May 07)
- RE: Force10 E Series at the edge? Vinny_Abello (May 07)
- RE: Force10 E Series at the edge? Vinny_Abello (May 07)