nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 11:36:23 +0000
On Apr 28, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
People might scared to rely on DNS on accepting routes, but is this really an issue?
Yes, recursive dependencies are an issue. I'm really surprised that folks are even seriously considering something like this, but OTOH, this sort of thing keeps cropping up in various contexts from time to time, sigh. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Dobbins, Roland (May 01)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? paul vixie (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Richard Barnes (May 29)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (May 01)