nanog mailing list archives
Re: isc - a good business
From: paul vixie <vixie () isc org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 13:43:24 +0000
On 5/28/2012 11:52 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
... maybe a bit too much layer ten for my taste. ...
on that, we're trying to improve. for example, we used to forego features that some of us found repugnant, such as nxdomain remapping / ad insertion. since the result was that our software was less relevant but that there was no reduction in nxdomain remapping as a result of BIND not providing it. so we dropped some of the layer ten stuff and moved more in the direction of providing features the community of interest found relevant. some say we sold out. maybe that's what manning is on about, i can't tell. the software is free, and isc cherishes our relevance. if you catch us doing wierd layer ten stuff that bugs you, give a shout. maybe we don't really mean it.
... and i run and appreciate the software.
that's why we're here. paul
Current thread:
- isc - a good business paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business George Herbert (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Paul Vixie (May 28)
- NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Jay Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. bmanning (May 28)
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Message not available
- Re: NXDomain remapping, DNSSEC, Layer 9, and you. George Herbert (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business paul vixie (May 28)
- Re: isc - a good business Randy Bush (May 28)