nanog mailing list archives
Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
From: Aleksi Suhonen <nanog-poster () axu tm>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 08:06:23 +0300
Morning,I have no idea what's really going on at LLNW, but I thought I'd still share an alternative view on this matter:
My understanding is that LLNW is spending tons of money to upgrade some of their IXP connections to 100GbE in Europe. With that in mind, I'm not that surprised if they wish to get some new income to cover those costs. While content is king, eye balls are kings too. Go figure.
-- Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy Internetworking Consulting Cellular: +358 45 670 2048 World Wide Web: www.axu.tm
Current thread:
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too., (continued)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Mike Hale (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. David Miller (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. William Herrin (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Joe Provo (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Jimmy Hess (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Valdis . Kletnieks (May 01)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Thomas Mangin (May 02)
- RE: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Leigh Porter (May 02)
- Re: CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too. Patrick W. Gilmore (May 02)