Re: AS 1668 BGP contact - possible prefix hijacking

[Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy () gmail com>]

Big thanks to several folks for their help yesterday:

AS 1668 for contacting me off list and the conducting a very thorough
review of the routes in questions
AS 4323, AS 19151 for verifying routes were received and advertised as
expected
routeviews.org for verifying the routes received from AS 13703 were suspect
AS 13703 for isolating the issue and fixing it

NANOG is a great community and I hope to see y'all in NOLA next year.

-Ben
AS 32440

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy () gmail com> wrote:

> Hi:
>
> Is there anyone here who can help us with a possible prefix hijacking
> situation through ATDN?  Please contact me off list if you (or you know
> somebody) that can help us.  I've tried the ATDN NOC and Vikas, but they
> have been no help whatsoever.
>
> The hijacked prefix appears to be sent to AS 1668, then propagated from
> there.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ben
> AS 32440