nanog mailing list archives
Re: MPLS acceptable latency?
From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:14:38 -0800
Acceptable from a technical standpoint (in that stuff works) or acceptable from an expected service standpoint? In the case of the former, MPLS can run over really high latencies, so you're nowhere near the limit. For the latter, 85ms would be highly unacceptable to me for a circuit to a site that's so close. I would think your traffic is either being routed really, really badly or their circuits are way over-subscribed. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mikeal Clark <mikeal.clark () gmail com>wrote:
Hello! I have some AT&T MPLS sites under a managed contract with latency averaging 75-85 ms without any load. These sites are only 45 minutes away. What is considered normal/acceptable? Thanks,
-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Current thread:
- MPLS acceptable latency? Mikeal Clark (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Dan White (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Mike Hale (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Jared Mauch (Nov 15)
- Message not available
- Fwd: MPLS acceptable latency? david peahi (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? William Herrin (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Randy (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Alex (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Randy (Nov 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Scott Weeks (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Jared Mauch (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Mikeal Clark (Nov 15)
- RE: MPLS acceptable latency? Adam Vitkovsky (Nov 16)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? PC (Nov 15)
- Re: MPLS acceptable latency? Jared Mauch (Nov 15)