nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google/Youtube problems
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:59:22 +0200
On (2012-11-19 08:27 -0500), Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Second, I see no reason why that requires anything close - not even within a couple orders of magnitude - of 10% of the Internet's revenue to be profitable. Why would you assume such a thing?
Agreed, 10% of Internet's revenue would be exaggeration. What I'm trying to say, I can't see youtube generating anywhere nearly enough revenue who shift 10% (or more) of Internet. And to explain this conundrum to myself, I've speculated accounting magic (which I'd frown upon) and leveraging market position to get free capacity (which is ok, I'd do the same, had I the leverage) -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Google/Youtube problems Daniel Suchy (Nov 18)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Saku Ytti (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Patrick W . Gilmore (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Saku Ytti (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Leo Bicknell (Nov 19)
- RE: Google/Youtube problems Adam Vitkovsky (Nov 19)
- RE: Google/Youtube problems Adam Vitkovsky (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Saku Ytti (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Michael Loftis (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems joel jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Joly MacFie (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Patrick W . Gilmore (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Saku Ytti (Nov 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Nick Olsen (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Scott Whyte (Nov 19)
- Re: Google/Youtube problems Nick Olsen (Nov 19)