Re: NTP Issues Today

[George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>]

As a reminder - time infrastructure is not recommended for
virtualization.  Make them physicals.


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Blake Dunlap <ikiris () gmail com> wrote:
> That's what happens when you just follow vendor recommendations blindly. If
> you do follow that on vm's (which can actually be a good practice), make
> sure they pull from your own time infrastructure, and not just the world at
> large, and that those servers behave in a sane fashion with regard to time
> jumps.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
> > > Are you sure that you are actually using NTP to set your clock?
> > > For you to sync with 2000,  you should have had multiple confused
> > > peers from multiple time sources;  possibly a false radio signal....
> > >
> > > NTP by default has a panic threshold of 1000 seconds.
> > >
> > > This  _should_   have caused NTP to execute a panic shutdown,
> > > instead of setting the clock back  30 million seconds.
> >
> > For VMWare at least, their official recommendation[1] for NTP is to
> >
> > tinker panic 0
> >
> > for suspend/resume reasons. I've seen it default in some places.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1006427
> >
> > --
> > Darius Jahandarie



-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert () gmail com