nanog mailing list archives
Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
From: Tom Beecher <tbeecher () localnet com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:31:52 -0500
47 U.S.C. 230 doesn't do much for child porn, no. However, PROTECT does. PROTECT spells out reporting, but also contains safe harbor provisions such that an ISP who didn't know that child porn was being transmitted across their network cannot be prosecuted for not knowing, only for not taking the required reporting/preservation/destruction actions as required by law. And in practice, the process is: On 11/29/2012 5:06 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:26:57 -0500 From: Tom Beecher <tbeecher () localnet com> Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. 230 is the US law that has been interpreted to provide immunity to ISP for the actions of their users.It is worth noting that 47 U.S.C. 230 provides _limited_ protections, only. Broad protection, but limited. It says that a provider shall not 'be treated as author' for material provided by someone else. This of little-to-no help with regard to kiddie porn, since distribution, and even 'mere' possession, are crimes -- independant of authorship.
Current thread:
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can., (continued)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Kyle Creyts (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Emily Ozols (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Eugen Leitl (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. elijah wright (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Eugen Leitl (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Tom Beecher (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. George Herbert (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Tom Beecher (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. George Herbert (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Tom Beecher (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Robert Bonomi (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Tom Beecher (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. George Herbert (Nov 29)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Naslund, Steve (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. George Herbert (Nov 29)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Miles Fidelman (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Michael Painter (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Naslund, Steve (Nov 29)
- Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. George Herbert (Nov 29)
- RE: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can. Naslund, Steve (Nov 29)