nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv6 Ignorance


From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 19:46:11 -0700

Or just use their IP address as a useful universal identifier, which is
kind of the point of V6. Whether you can be routed to isn't the point.
It's that, if/when you can, there is an address, and it's easy to
assign/divine, that you can be reached at, is.


-----Original Message-----
From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herbert () gmail com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:17 PM
To: John R. Levine; George Herbert
Cc: Tomas L. Byrnes; nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Ignorance

My customer the Dark Matter local galaxy group beg to disagree; just
because you cannot see them does not mean that you cannot feel them
gravitationally.

Or route to them.


George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:31 PM, "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com> wrote:

You won't have enough addresses for Dark Matter, Neutrinos, etc.
Atoms wind up using up about 63 bits (2^10^82) based on the current
SWAG. The missing mass is 84% of the universe.

Fortunately, until we find it, it doesn't need addresses.


-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:30 PM
To: John Levine
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Ignorance

In technology, not much.  But I'd be pretty surprised if the laws
of arithmetic were to change, or if we were to find it useful to
assign IP addresses to objects smaller than a single atom.

we assign them /64s

Regards,
John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet
for
Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this
e-mail.
http://jl.ly



Current thread: