nanog mailing list archives
Re: 169.254.0.0/16
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:25:16 -0400
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Majdi S. Abbas <msa () latt net> wrote:
RFCs are just paper. As for why they use it.. the common private use reserved blocks (10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16) are all in use internally in their customers networks. This is probably the easiest way to avoid addressing conflicts.
but, but, but!! we have that nifty new '1918' space... 100.64.0.0/10 :)
Current thread:
- 169.254.0.0/16 Darren O'Connor (Oct 18)
- Re: 169.254.0.0/16 Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 18)
- RE: 169.254.0.0/16 Darren O'Connor (Oct 18)
- Re: 169.254.0.0/16 Christopher Morrow (Oct 18)
- Re: 169.254.0.0/16 Arturo Servin (Oct 19)
- Re: 169.254.0.0/16 joel jaeggli (Oct 19)
- Re: 169.254.0.0/16 Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 18)
- Re: 169.254.0.0/16 joel jaeggli (Oct 20)