nanog mailing list archives
Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T
From: "Summers, William" <wsummers () deerfield edu>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:14:09 -0400
We've been using IBM 10G switches (8124 and 8264) sfp varieties back when they were Blade Networks. Very good performance, cost, and support. The use of DACs/Twinax in our datacenters made our 10G overhaul budget work.
Current thread:
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T, (continued)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Jima (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Andreas Echavez (Oct 01)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Jima (Oct 01)
- RE: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Tribble, Wesley (Oct 01)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Andreas Echavez (Oct 01)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Miquel van Smoorenburg (Oct 01)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Brian Loveland (Oct 02)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Brian Loveland (Oct 02)
- RE: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Drew Weaver (Oct 03)
- RE: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Jima (Oct 03)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Brian Loveland (Oct 02)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Adam Atkinson (Oct 01)
- Re: So what's the deal with 10Gbase-T Summers, William (Oct 02)