nanog mailing list archives
Re: Please, talk me down.
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:26:18 +0530
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf () dessus com> wrote:
What is really meant to be said is that MTA's which require RFC compliance won't talk to you. Running an MTA which requires minimal RFC compliance (particularly in respect of DNS configuration) eliminates 98% of spam.
I wish it were that easy. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Please, talk me down., (continued)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Mark Andrews (Oct 16)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Octavio Alvarez (Oct 16)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Antonio Querubin (Oct 16)
- Re: Please, talk me down. JP Viljoen (Oct 16)
- Re: Please, talk me down. John Levine (Oct 17)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Nicolai (Oct 17)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Jay Mitchell (Oct 21)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Jay Mitchell (Oct 21)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Nicolai (Oct 21)
- RE: Please, talk me down. Keith Medcalf (Oct 21)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 21)
- Re: Please, talk me down. Mark Andrews (Oct 21)
- forward and reverse DNS (was: Please, talk me down.) Andrew Sullivan (Oct 22)
- IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 22)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Dobbins, Roland (Oct 22)
- RE: IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 23)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Ray Soucy (Oct 29)
- RE: IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Ray Soucy (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Shahab Vahabzadeh (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU William Herrin (Oct 29)