nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP tunnel MTU
From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:01:50 -0000 (GMT)
Certainly fixing all the buggy host stacks, firewall and compliance devices to realize that ICMP isn't bad won't be hard.Wait till you get started on "fixing" the "security" consultants.
Ack. I've yet to come across a *device* that doesn't deal properly with "packet too big". Lots (and lots and lots) of "security" people, one or two applications, but no devices. Regards, Tim.
Current thread:
- RE: IP tunnel MTU, (continued)
- RE: IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Ray Soucy (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Shahab Vahabzadeh (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU William Herrin (Oct 29)
- RE: IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Chris Woodfield (Oct 29)
- RE: IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 30)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Joe Maimon (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Tim Durack (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Tim Franklin (Oct 30)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Sander Steffann (Oct 30)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Jeroen Massar (Oct 30)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Joe Maimon (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- RE: IP tunnel MTU Templin, Fred L (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Masataka Ohta (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Joe Maimon (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU bmanning (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU Joe Maimon (Oct 29)
- Re: IP tunnel MTU bmanning (Oct 29)