nanog mailing list archives

Re: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring?


From: Andrew Gallo <akg1330 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:34:48 -0400


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
On 10/3/2012 10:16 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Joseph Jackson wrote:

I have cacti graph the amount of prefixes announced and withdrawn
from a BGP peer on each BGP router.

+1

Note that not all router OSs support fetching data like that via SNMP.

We use a custom built thing internally that does this two, which we
then tack on an alert threshold for. So if a downstream peer sends us
less than that, we get an alert. Handy for those times when they call
and ask us what we did to their network. :-)

Prior to that, we had a script which whould login, munge the 'show ip
bgp summary' table output, figure out the deltas and graph or report as
needed on a particularly troublesome peer.




-----Original Message-----
From: ML [mailto:ml () kenweb org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 11:43 PM
To: North American Networking and Offtopic Gripes List
Subject: Internet routing table "completeness" monitoring?

Has anyone put in place a method to identify if one their BGP peers
suddenly withdraws X% of their prefixes?

e.g I should expect ~420k prefixes in a "complete"[1] routing table
from a transit peer today. If suddenly I'm only getting 390k prefixes
I'd guess a major network was depeered or similiar.

If so how are people doing this? SNMP MIB, screen scrape?



[1] Varying levels of completeless apply.




wfms


So, there is something called the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP):
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-06
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/abstracts.php?pt=MTM2NiZuYW5vZzQ1&nm=nanog45

Looks like it is supported in JunOS.

Has anyone used it?  If so, what monitoring software are you using?


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
 
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQbFsYAAoJEBxhAh+LWUKi/WwIAKxVmcCfI6xng0lAL5UxHSGK
v+fp5Q1d40hCu1aWWeeV/eYvyOEZSwkY/jSK0EaVrdmv0y4GQttQqSfGk+1RQOK/
jZAD/r0Fd9K9vMLJ5Te+bkjYuOp23G2bDn8QWuls4HBc1nHxkPc6arzUTgTzEFAZ
+Ljk3MQSHiZ+nb6fkX+Yb7e3UJZjpkuWaNeqGcKz9FR9PJT5UZI8Yf2iwMHtVl/l
R9XfAIG/xDd64oKEDbt8JmtQkqS64ZnCFe+B/yEuTKC6Pl0DUm4orH7322oxjxOW
yDloqmhO5pCmVETFHwn0ocTpDKqG2zE4zA4bHL+w+xePSS61DpUf51V3eg8JgZo=
=Ofld
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Current thread: