nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking MX query
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:54:11 +0530
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Ibrahim <ibrahim1 () gmail com> wrote:
Not block, but we use DNS transparent proxy mechanism. We need to do this as our government request all ISP to block porn sites :-)
Plenty of ways to work around that actually. This stops random people from accessing porn sites but you are not likely to see spammers or bots get deterred too much by this mechanism. Still it does come in useful as part of a larger walled garden strategy. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Blocking MX query Ibrahim (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Ibrahim (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Ibrahim (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Bacon Zombie (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Ibrahim (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Ibrahim (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Rich Kulawiec (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Jimmy Hess (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Mark Andrews (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Mark Andrews (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Jimmy Hess (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Mark Andrews (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Rich Kulawiec (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)