nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Ignorance


From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:22:21 +0200 (CEST)

On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Randy Bush wrote:

and don't bs me with how humongous the v6 address space is. we once though 32 bits was humongous.

Giving out a /48 to every person on earth uses approximately 2^33 networks, meaning we could cram it into a /15. So even if we have 10 /48s at home from different providers, we're still only using a small fraction of the first /3. If we get this wrong, we have several more /3s to get it right in.

You already know this, and I can't really believe that people sat down in the 70ties and 80ties and said "there is never going to be more than 128 large corporations that need a /8 in IPv4" ?

I start to get worried when people want to map 32 bits into IPv6 in several places, for instance telling all ISPs that they can have a /24 so that we can produce IPv4 mapped /56 to end customer, and make this space permanent. Temporary is fine, permanent is not.

So I agree with you that there is still a risk that this is going to get screwed up, but I don't feel too gloomy yet.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: