nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:42:59 +0100
On 19/09/2012 22:02, David Conrad wrote:
Assuming for the sake of argument that the 51/8 is actually unused (which it apparently isn't), the UK gov't would be under no contractual obligation to return the address space to IANA (which is (arguably) the allocating registry, not RIPE) -- I believe that "class A" was allocated prior to the existence of the RIRs and registration service agreements.
the ripe ncc has short-circuited this particular argument by committing to hand back to IANA any legacy address space which is handed back to it. I.e. makes no difference - it ends up at IANA anyway. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8, (continued)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Eugen Leitl (Sep 18)
- Message not available
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Tim Chown (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 John Levine (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 George Herbert (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Seth Mos (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Bacon Zombie (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 George Herbert (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 david peahi (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Robert Guerra (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 George Herbert (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 David Conrad (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Nick Hilliard (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 John Levine (Sep 19)