nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking MX query
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:15:12 +0530
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
While ISPs in the future should use not IPv6 but NAT with fixed IP addresses and sets of port numbers assigned to their customers, keeping the end to end transparency, it does not solve the problem of blocked port 25. Note that IPv6 do not solve the problem of blocked port 25, either.
So - now with ipv6 you're going to see "hi, my toto highly computerized toilet is trying to make outbound port 25 connections to gmail" http://www.telecoms.com/48734/vodafone-and-ibm-team-up-on-connected-home-appliances/ -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking MX query, (continued)
- Re: Blocking MX query Mark Andrews (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Jay Ashworth (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Ray Wong (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Jay Ashworth (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query valdis . kletnieks (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Masataka Ohta (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query David Barak (Sep 05)
- Re: Blocking MX query William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Jay Ashworth (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query George Herbert (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Ibrahim (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Jay Ashworth (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query William Herrin (Sep 04)
- Re: Blocking MX query Michael Thomas (Sep 04)