nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:55:52 +1000
In message <51626CF9.1040109 () phyxia net>, Tom Laermans writes:
On 7/04/2013 19:46, Jared Mauch wrote:I've continued to update my dataset originally posted about two weeks ago. Please take a momentand review your CIDRs which may be running an open resolver.I've exposed one additional bit in the user-interface that may be helpful. Some DNS servers will respond with RCODE=0 (OK) but not provide recursion. nearly 90% of the servers in the database provide recursion. What is the rationale behind listing servers not providing recursion on a list of open resolvers? As far as I know, responding either NOERROR or REFUSED produces packets of the same size. Tom
NOERROR can be a referral. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Open Resolver Dataset Update Jared Mauch (Apr 07)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update Tom Laermans (Apr 08)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update Mark Andrews (Apr 08)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update Jared Mauch (Apr 08)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update Tom Laermans (Apr 09)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update Jared Mauch (Apr 09)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update A. Pishdadi (Apr 09)
- Re: Open Resolver Dataset Update Tom Laermans (Apr 08)