Re: cloudmark?

[Martin Hotze <m.hotze () hotze com>]

> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:31:08 -0400
> From: Chris Conn <cconn () b2b2c ca>
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: cloudmark?
> Message-ID: <5164262C.3070806 () b2b2c ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 2013-04-09 10:27, Chris Conn wrote:
> >
(...)
> Your experience does not mirror mine at all.  I have less than 30

good for you. :-)

> minutes of wait time for any support case, and they are few and far
> between.  Reliability is high and FP rate is low.   I have no idea what
> your reference to lawyers pertains to, however the only issue we have
> ever had was for them to take our money when we renewed for the
> umpteenth time.

We are not a paying cloudmark customer.
We just want to get one of our IPv4 address off of their list.

 #m